OCCASIONAL PAPER SERIES
NO 91 / JULY 2008
by Roland Beck and Michael Fidora
THE IMPACT OF SOVEREIGN WEALTH FUNDS ON GLOBAL FINANCIAL MARKETS
ABSTRACT
This paper analyses the impact of sovereign
wealth funds (SWFs) on global fi nancial markets.
It presents back-of-the-envelope calculations
which simulate the potential impact of a transfer
of traditional foreign exchange reserves to SWFs
on global capital fl ows. If SWFs behave as
CAPM-type investors and thus allocate foreign
assets according to market capitalisation rather
than liquidity considerations, offi cial portfolios
reduce their “bias” towards the major reserve
currencies. As a result, more capital fl ows
“downhill” from rich to less wealthy economies,
in line with standard neoclassical predictions.
More specifi cally, it is found that under the
assumption of SWFs investing according to
market capitalisation weights, the euro area and
the United States could be subject to net capital
outfl ows while Japan and the emerging markets
would attract net capital infl ows. It is also shown
that these fi ndings are sensitive to alternative
assumptions for the portfolio objectives of
SWFs. Finally, the paper discusses whether a
change in net capital fl ows triggered by SWFs
could have an impact on stock prices and bond
yields. Based on an event study approach, no
evidence can be found for a stock price impact
of non-commercially motivated stock sales by
Norway’s Government Pension Fund.
Norway’s Government Pension Fund
and Challenges of Capital Flows
International Forum of Sovereign Wealth Funds
3 October 2013
Yngve Slyngstad, Chief Executive Officer
Active ownership focus areas
Financial investor
Minority shareholder
Long-term horizon
Principle based
Environmental and social risks:
Children’s rights
Climate change
Water management
Markets:
Well-functioning financial markets
Corporate governance:
Equal treatment of shareholders
Shareholder influence and board
accountability
--------------30--------------
This BLOG looks at pensions and their impact on what are called Public Private Partnerships or P3’s these are not really about private funding at all but about two streams of public funding, pensions and government with private capital a third partner.
We will also deal with other pension matters, such as Defined Contribution Plans (DC) vs Defined Benefit (DB) PLANS, the weakness in private plans, the need for pension reform in public pensions to have shareholder rights, directorships and ethical investment directives and policies.
Finally taking the long view we will show how these funds are forms of evolving social capital that is dominating private capital as we evolve into socialization of capital.
Click HERE to read more....
We will also deal with other pension matters, such as Defined Contribution Plans (DC) vs Defined Benefit (DB) PLANS, the weakness in private plans, the need for pension reform in public pensions to have shareholder rights, directorships and ethical investment directives and policies.
Finally taking the long view we will show how these funds are forms of evolving social capital that is dominating private capital as we evolve into socialization of capital.
Click HERE to read more....
No comments:
Post a Comment