IMPACT INVESTMENT: THE
INVISIBLE HEART OF MARKETS
Harnessing the power of
entrepreneurship, innovation and capital for public good
Report of the SOCIAL IMPACT INVESTMENT TASK FORCE
Established under the UK ’s presidency
of the G8
15 September 2014
It is urgent that
governments throughout
the world commit themselves
to developing an
international framework
capable of promoting
a market of high impact
investments and
thus to combating an economy
which
excludes and discards.
Pope Francis, June 2014
In June last
year Prime Minister David Cameron announced, during the UK ’s presidency
of the G8,
the launch
of an independent Taskforce and set it the ambitious objective of reporting on
‘catalysing
a global
market in impact investment’ in order to improve society.
It has been
a remarkable experience since then to lead an exceptionally talented and
committed group of
more than
200 people across the world in achieving this inspiring mission and I thank
them most warmly
for all they
have done. The Taskforce itself comprises some twenty-two people, including one
government
official and
one representative of the social or private sector from seven countries and the
EU, as well
as one
observer from Australia .
But to inform our work and to drive its implementation in the future,
we created
eight National Advisory Boards. We also established four international expert
Working
Groups to
address in depth the particular challenges of measuring impact, asset
allocation, mission
in business
and international development, all of which are critical to the success of our
endeavour.
We are
honoured to deliver to you this report together with four subject papers that
provide
supplementary
detail on important elements of our work. Each of the National Advisory Boards
also
launches
today its own report on what is required in its country if it is to bring
impact investment to
take off.
Our reports have all been written with the aim of attracting as wide a
readership as possible,
to include
all audiences interested in impact investing.
Our
investigations have benefitted greatly from the insights of numerous
impact-driven organisations
and
entrepreneurs, foundations and philanthropists, investors, businesses,
government ministers and
officials
who have contributed their expertise and their experience to our deliberations.
We are most
grateful to
them all. As a result, we can confirm the tremendous potential of impact
investment to
improve
society and the environment. We note that it is already shifting the paradigm
in how we think
about and
tackle social and environmental issues in the 21st century, in developed and in
developing
countries
alike. The Taskforce will now continue its work for a second year to drive the
take-up and
implementation
of our recommendations.
Our
recommendations are critical to the success of impact investment. They define
what is needed
from all
actors in our society: government, business, the social sector and foundations,
institutional
and private
investors, and most importantly impact entrepreneurs. The role of each of these
groups
is addressed
in this report. Impact investment is emerging as a new unifying force among
them in
dealing with
social issues, driving innovation and prevention to improve lives. It harnesses
the forces
of
entrepreneurship, innovation and capital and the power of markets to do good.
One might with
justification
say that it brings the invisible heart of markets to guide their invisible
hand.
Yours
sincerely,
Sir Ronald
Cohen
Taskforce
Chair
The world is
on the brink of
a revolution
in how we solve
society’s
toughest problems.
The force
capable of driving
this
revolution is ‘social impact
investing’,
which harnesses
entrepreneurship,
innovation
and capital
to power social
improvement.
It is
already bringing significant advances in areas
such as
reducing prisoner reoffending, caring for
children and
the elderly, community regeneration,
financial
inclusion, and supported housing. It
has the potential
to generate great benefits in
developed as
well as developing countries.
Social
impact investing, impact investing for short
throughout
this report, encompasses environmental
impact. It
is at the core of a broad ‘impact continuum’,
that runs
from philanthropy to responsible and
sustainable
investment, which includes all those
seeking to
achieve positive impact. Impact
investment
is growing fast. The amount invested by
the 125
leading impact investors is forecast to grow
by nearly
20% this year, according to the latest study
by the
Global Impact Investment Network (GIIN) and
JP Morgan.
Given that $45 trillion are in mainstream
investment
funds that have publicly committed to
incorporate
environmental, social and governance
factors into
their investment decisions,2
it would only
need a small
fraction of this money to start moving
into impact
investment for it to expand rapidly along
the growth
path to the mainstream previously taken
by venture
capital and private equity.
Social
Impact Investments are those that
intentionally
target specific social objectives
along with a
financial return and measure the
achievement
of both.
The
financial crash of 2008 highlighted the need for
a renewed
effort to ensure that finance helps build
a healthy
society.
This
requires a paradigm shift in capital market
thinking,
from two-dimensions to three. By bringing
a third
dimension, impact, to the 20th century
capital
market dimensions of risk and return,
impact
investing has the potential to transform
our ability
to build a better society for all.
It is
arriving at a time when a generational shift is
taking place
in how people, especially younger
people, see
their role in solving society’s problems.3
Doing good
and doing well are no longer seen as
incompatible.
There is a growing desire to reconnect
work with
meaning and purpose, to make a
difference.
This is leading to an increasing supply
of people
looking for employers with an explicit
commitment
to improve the world. There has
been a rapid
rise globally in the number of impact
entrepreneurs
who want to find innovative ways to
solve
society’s problems, and they are increasingly
deploying
the methods of business and private
capital if
that helps them to do so. They include
people in
the social sector who can now tap the
markets for
finance in addition to seeking grants
from donors,
and philanthropists who are willing
to fund
businesses rather than social sector
organisations
if that offers a greater likelihood of
achieving
the social impact they desire. They are
leading a
shift in philanthropy from a focus on the
act of
giving to the impact it achieves.
This new
approach is built on a number of shared
beliefs:
that, in some cases, investment can be
more
effective than donations in helping the poor;
that social
motivations harnessed to financial ones
can
sometimes do good more effectively; and that
in many
situations there is no inevitable trade-off
between
financial and social return.
It is also
becoming ever clearer that there
is an
increasing need for innovative and effective
solutions to
society’s problems. Impact investment
is a
response to the growing awareness in both the
public and
private sectors that the challenges
facing
society in the 21st century are too large and
too complex
to be solved by government and the
social
sector alone. Old problems are proving more
resistant
than expected to efforts to solve them,
whilst some
problems such as diabetes and
recidivism
are taking on a new urgency and may
well prove
cheaper to prevent than the costs of
dealing with
their consequences.
So despite
their different models for tackling social
and
environmental challenges, governments
everywhere
are under ever greater pressure to make
meaningful
progress in tackling the social problems
facing their
countries. All of the countries on the
Taskforce
also face growing pressure, in a context
of fiscal
restraint, to allocate government spending
more
efficiently and effectively to social needs.
.--------------30--------------
This BLOG looks at pensions and their impact on what are called Public Private Partnerships or P3’s these are not really about private funding at all but about two streams of public funding, pensions and government with private capital a third partner.
We will also deal with other pension matters, such as Defined Contribution Plans (DC) vs Defined Benefit (DB) PLANS, the weakness in private plans, the need for pension reform in public pensions to have shareholder rights, directorships and ethical investment directives and policies.
Finally taking the long view we will show how these funds are forms of evolving social capital that is dominating private capital as we evolve into socialization of capital.
No comments:
Post a Comment